Ossipee Board Approves Funds for Milfoil Suction Harvesting

Ossipee — August 26, 2010 — Selectmen took some action Monday in the mitigation battle against invasive milfoil and authorized $6,500 for suction harvesting of the weed in Phillips Brooks and Pickerel Cove in Ossipee Lake.

Acknowledging, “Doing something now is better than doing nothing,” board chair Harry Merrow, and members Kathleen Maloney and Morton Leavitt voted unanimously in favor after a discussion with members of the town’s milfoil committee and an Ossipee Lake Alliance member.

Earlier this season, board members refused to sign a contract to treat areas with the herbicide, 2, 4-D, because the contract held the town, rather than the state or the treatment company, responsible if anything went wrong.

“The town assumed liability…I would never sign that contract,” said Merrow at the Aug. 23 meeting. And the board never did.

When Leavitt asked whether it would be wiser to wait until spring to take action to mitigate milfoil, Conservation Commission and Milfoil Committee member Elizabeth Gillette paraphrased state limnologist and milfoil expert Amy Smagula.

“Doing something now is better than doing nothing,” said Gillette. Prior to the vote, Gillette suggested that the motion specify that suction harvesting be done “at the leading edge of the milfoil” growth. Trained divers will assist in the suction harvesting efforts early this fall.

Gillette added that Smagula indicated she would come up to install the benthic barriers, which prevent migration of the weed, into the lake. In recent meetings on milfoil mitigation, most experts agree that a combination of herbicide (2,4-D) and suction harvesting works well to keep growth down.

Invasive milfoil is a problem throughout the state and local lakefront communities,such as Freedom and Wolfeboro, have launched aggressive offensives.

With assistance from the NH Department of Environment Services and input from the Ossipee Lake Alliance, the town created a long-term variable milfoil management and control plan for the lake system through 2015.

At the meeting, Merrow said the town needs a long-term plan that lists associated costs. Gillette provided the board with a suggested timeline and action plan created earlier this year. The plan utilized a mix of herbicide treatment, diver-assisted suction harvesting, benthic barrier placement, and a prevention and early detection program.

One member of the Ossipee Lake Alliance hit on the prevention and awareness angle at the meeting.

“There’s no signage whatsoever,” noted Perry Fine, a member of milfoil committee in Ossipee and the Broad/Leavitt Bay Association. Fine is also an Ossipee Lake Alliance member.

“No one has any idea they’re whether they are going into an infested area; if you do nothing next year it will get worse. We do need to put some signage up and limit access to infested areas,” said Fine.

Merrow said signs were a good idea but questioned whether the state would be responsible for installing them. He also suggested that DES may be “part of the problem” since years ago, and ostensibly prior to state intervention, he used to rake out the organic material at the bottom of the lake. Officials have noted that the debris at the lake’s edge and bottom may be favorable to milfoil growth.

Milfoil Committee member Jim Fitzpatrick asked the board about setting aside funds at town meeting, through warrant articles, for milfoil mitigation. The mitigation costs go well beyond the $5,000 currently set aside from the town.

“I’m wondering what is the process of getting on the town warrant early enough. We need to increase that amount,” he said.

Broad Bay homeowners pay approximately $1.5 million in property taxes and he thinks homeowners would be willing to pay a few extra dollars a year to protect their property values.

Merrow said the town in a bad economy couldn’t afford to allocate large amounts in every year. He said the state is supposed to pay 50 percent of the costs, with the remainder split between towns and homeowners.

He said the state’s funds are drying up.


  1. Jane 14 years ago August 31, 2010

    ” homeowners pay approximately $1.5 million in property taxes and he thinks homeowners would be willing to pay a few extra dollars a year to protect their property values” said board chair Harry Mellow.

    As a property owner with ridiculously high property taxes I would like to tell Mr. Mellow that I have no interest in paying a few extra dollars. What I would like is for my exiting property taxes to be used to protect the property.

  2. Bob 14 years ago August 31, 2010

    I agree with Jane,I would think for all the money we pay in taxes that some would be used for the protection of the lake.aside from snowplowing we receive no other service that i know of, so where is that money being applied ?

  3. Jim 14 years ago September 1, 2010

    Why in the world is the state boat launch free???? There should be a twenty dollar fee to use it. That might help with some of the funding.

  4. Don 14 years ago September 1, 2010

    I am moved by the responses to any subject at all. No matter what the topic, people respond with comments about excessive taxes for which no services are rendered. For the record, I totally agree with the the feelings being presented. All you have to do is to scratch the surface and the fury of the underlying attitudes surface. The tax code in NH is a disgrace, and the burden placed on the property owner is ridiculous. Beyond that there are more hidden taxes and fees in NH than anywhere (including MA). Take a trip to thye Ossipee Landfill if you want a real dose of reality. What is it that NH residents are proud of that keep them from becoming human? Another free is not the answer. Re-writing the tax code is.

  5. atony 14 years ago September 1, 2010

    Well said!!!!
    Not only do we not want to “pay a few extra dollars” but Mellow knows full well that most of us on the lake are not NH residents and we can not vote on the warrents. Basically it’s a few locals voting on how to spend the “out of state” money…
    It’s language and attitude like this that just grinds me……

    The boat launches are free because the state does not want the “poor” locals to pay to use the lake. So in an effort to open the lake to everyone the state prompted milfoil infestation by allowing any stray, unchecked boat onto the lake….it’s just a matter of time before we “the property owners” get hit up for the money to fix the problem that we had nothing to do with creating.
    It’s no wonder tax abatements are rarely approved. Even in light of the declining realestate market the state does not believe that the real estate market on Ossipee has declined at all since 2005…I’m so glad I can fund schools, sport fields, town halls ect and only spend about 2 months out of the year at the lake. Sure, take on the milfoil bill as well….


Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *