Selectmen Say Boat Ramp Needs Milfoil Prevention Plan

Ossipee – October 7, 2011 – Milfoil prevention was on the mind of local elected officials and some of the approximately 30 people who attended two September 21 public meetings on the state’s proposal to “improve the functionality” of the Pine River boat landing on Route 25. The busy landing, which is the only state-owned public access facility for Ossipee Lake, has been deteriorating for years with safety hazards ranging from rutted roads to rotted docks. NH Fish and Game assumed responsibility for the site several years ago and began cleaning it up this summer.

Now it wants to complete the job by making improvements that include replacing the boat launch with a double ramp and establishing better-defined parking areas. Fish and Game official Jeff King said the project will cost $250,000 to $750,000 and take several years to complete once plans are approved.

Fish and Game set up the meetings, which were held in Ossipee, to allow the public to comment on the plan. While the proposed physical improvements were generally well-received, local officials were surprised that the plan is silent on the issue of milfoil, which is spread by boats and is a significant problem for Ossipee Lake.

In a letter to Fish and Game officials, Ossipee’s Select Board said “Since milfoil is spread primarily by boats, we believe that any plan to improve or expand the Pine River Boat Ramp should include a state-funded boat inspection program to prevent milfoil from entering or leaving the lake.”

Freedom’s Board of Selectmen sent a similar letter, stating “We believe that it should be the responsibility of the agency improving the access to fund this [boat inspection] effort on a continuing basis,” adding that the Town of Freedom has spent more than $130,000 to treat milfoil in the lake and prevent its spread. The Freedom Board additionally asked Fish and Game to provide “extra resources” for boat inspections during the bass fishing tournaments the agency sponsors. The letter said tournament boats often use the lake’s milfoil-infested areas, where their props can dislodge invasive weeds and spread fragments to new areas.

Ossipee Lake Alliance Director Bob Reynolds, who attended one of the meetings, said there is a growing frustration about the continued spread of milfoil and the cost to control it – a cost that has mainly been left to lake communities like Ossipee and Freedom, which together have spent $189,000 of town funds to battle the lake’s milfoil.

This year the Alliance commissioned a research study to determine how much the state is paying as a percentage of all spending on milfoil control. The results of the study, released in June, showed the state paid just 12% of the total cost of controlling milfoil last year and half of the state’s infested lakes have no control program at all.

Milfoil Prevention is Privately Managed
Complicating the issue of funding a milfoil plan at the Pine River ramp is the unusual role the state plays in milfoil prevention. While the state has long had a milfoil awareness initiative using print and online media and community outreach, the physical task of keeping milfoil out of lakes, including at state-owned ramps, is the responsibility of private initiatives like the Lake Host program, which is managed by the non-profit NH Lakes Association (NHLA).

The source of NHLA’s funding for the Lake Host program varies annually and in past years has included money from the Federal government. In 2011 the program was supported by a  grant from DES and the Department of Safety and “private donations,” according to the non-profit organization’s website.

There has been a Lake Host program at the Pine River ramp since 2002, according to Ossipee Conservation Commission member Jean Hansen. The Commission currently manages that program and a second one at the Town of Ossipee’s Pequawket Trail boat ramp.

When the Lake Host programs are operating, boaters receive a “courtesy inspection” of their craft when entering or leaving the water. An NHLA “payroll grant” pays for the inspectors as a match against the Conservation Commission’s volunteer time and “in-kind” contributions. Funding for the program must be applied for annually by the Conservation Commission, Hansen said, and is contingent on money being available from NHLA.

In a post-meeting email exchange with Ossipee Lake Alliance, Fish and Game official Jeff King said he felt the meetings were productive in “bringing forth public concerns and allowing the agency to describe the project.” He said the current design is preliminary and is subject to refinement. It must also go through the state’s environmental permitting process.

The Pine River landing, which is located near the junction of Routes 16 and 25 in Center Ossipee, was developed in the 1970s as a commercial business. After it failed, it was taken over by the state as part of its goal of increasing no-cost access to state lakes for boaters. Fish and Game now oversees more than 200 boat ramps around the state.


  1. atony 13 years ago October 12, 2011

    To those of you who where in denial that public boat ramps where a primary if not sole cause of the milfoil this article may shed a little light or at least render a nice dose of reality.
    I am encouraged that the milfoil is at least getting some serious attention but am tweaked that my tax dollars have to be spent on it. If all visitors to the lake paid a launch fee there could at least be an offset of the cost.

  2. Nichols Road Resident 13 years ago October 12, 2011

    As I live on Nichols Road the Pine River boat ramp is the one I use as it is closer than the town ramp.
    atony –
    If as you state “public boat ramps were a primary if not sole cause of milfoil” Why is there no milfoil on Pine River?
    Why is the Milfoil on the North end of Broad Bay? Surely there would be milfoil on Pine River and at the town ramp. The locations of the Milfoil in the Ossipee system suggest that milfoil is not from the public ramps.
    I have no problem with the inspections as I stay away from those locations when I am on the water, and have not been to any other lake in years. It is also my tax dollars at work, so I don’t disagree that it is an issue, but your comment is unfounded from the article, as no where does it state that the milfoil is from public ramps.

  3. atony 13 years ago October 12, 2011

    “In a letter to Fish and Game officials, Ossipee’s Select Board said “Since milfoil is spread primarily by boats, we believe that any plan to improve or expand the Pine River Boat Ramp should include a state funded boat inspection program to prevent milfoil from entering or leaving the lake.””

    ” the physical task of keeping milfoil out of lakes, including at state owned ramps, is the responsibility of private initiatives”


    I agree these comments do not directly state that the state boat ramps cause milfoil but certainly if you read between the lines, just a little bit, the implication is there. Why else would both Freedom and Ossipee be so concerned about including inspections at the state boat ramps.
    As far as Pine River is concerned I am not very familiar with it. But I do know from the “milfoil experts” the town of Ossipee has engaged that the milfoil fragments can break off and float with water currents for vast distances. So if the milfoil location is not in the proximity of a boat ramp that is not necessarily an indicator that everything is OK.
    Plus there are additional factors such as the coincidental timing of the occurrence of milfoil and the opening of public boat ramps.
    I’ve been on the lake since the 70’s and have seen a significant increase in boat traffic over the years. Many of those boats are daily drop ins. It is a fair assumption that those of us who live on the lake leave our boats in the lake (not 100% but most). The chance of a resident contaminating the lake with milfoil is 0 if their boat never leaves Ossipee lake. It is a safe and logical assertion that the milfoil was introduced by boats that came from other infected waters.
    The public boat ramps introduced a significant number of un-checked boats on to the lake. With that comes the increased risk of further infection.

    All I’m saying is we should be collecting a fee to off set the impending cost of milfoil containment and treatment.

  4. Nichols Road Resident 13 years ago October 13, 2011


    I don’t see it implying that the source of milfoil is public ramps, rather one source of possible contamination is the ramps, and it should be addressed when we have their attention (fish and game).

    One point not mentioned in the article is the spread of the milfoil already in the lake, how many people actually know where the infested locations are, and avoid them. From what I have read running a boat through an infested area is also a major source of milfoil spread. Just keeping the boats on the lake will not stop the spread. I believe it is also education of the boaters.

    You should take a ride up the Pine River – it’s like a mile to the boat ramp from the lake, it has a few tricky spots, branches / logs on the bottom – but it is beautiful. It is worth the ride especially with all the leaves changing. You will see what I mean about expecting a milfoil infestation on the river if a primary source of milfoil was from the Pine River ramp. With the log jams and shallow water it is a weed haven during the summer. Now that they are draining the lake for the year the ramp will be basically closed for all deeper draft boats.


Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *