Tax Relief for Ossipee’s Lakefront Property Owners

Special to Ossipee Lake Alliance

Ossipee—September 10, 2013—Lakefront property owners, including some who had not filed a request for a tax abatement, will receive tax relief after the Ossipee Board of Selectmen approved more than $123,045 in property tax rebates. According to an exhaustive review of Ossipee Lake land assessments prepared by Assessing Clerk Ellen White, the town will lose $7,916,200 in land value.

The town has funds available to cover the amount of abatements, according to Board of Selectmen Chair Harry Merrow, but the long range impact of such a hefty dip in assessed land value remains to be seen. Merrow added that he didn’t think the abatements or land value decrease would impact the town budget this year.

“Until we figure out what the budget is this year, we don’t know. Every year we pick up more [taxable] properties though, so it depends,” he said.

Checks either have gone out or will be sent to property owners whose values were adjusted following a thorough review of assessments by Todd Haywood of Granite Hill Municipal Services. Haywood replaced former contract assessor David Wiley in January.

Out of 159 abatement applications received at town hall, 135 involved lakefront properties. According to White, the largest tax abatement check was for $6,062 while a handful of other property values increases and some remain unchanged.

Haywood explained his methodology in an overview to the town’s select board. He stated that he noted inconsistencies in land assessments. including some in the coding of neighborhoods, and unexplained land condition adjustments. And when he reviewed the 2010 revaluation for a listing of land adjustment factor for lake properties, he found no explanations.

“The more I looked into these the more apparent it became the only way to truly ensure some semblance of continuity was to establish a set of parameters and apply them as uniformly as possible…I then looked at every property on the lake via drive-by inspection, relying on the notes on the assessment record card and made land adjustments accordingly,” he said.

In a follow up interview, Haywood said some adjustments on land value were made due to a steep slope or other topographic characteristic that would render the lakefront less valuable than a smooth, sandy beach.

He said in its 2012 Equalization Ration Study, the New Hampshire Department of Revenue Administration determined that the waterfront properties in Ossipee were assessed 10 percent higher than the rest of the municipality. As a result, Haywood lowered the land rate on Ossipee Lake by 10 percent and then conducted a field review. That review revealed other inconsistencies, such as seasonal cottages being taxed as year-round homes.

Mixed Reactions
Controversy over the town’s tax rate for lakefront properties arose in 2005 when values increased by 33 percent, according to Ossipee Lake property owner Roland Cherwek, one of the main parties who led the charge for a class action suit against the town last year. Cherwek and 62 other homeowners who experienced increases in values despite a real estate market downturn attempted to have their case heard as a class action suit. The New Hampshire Supreme Court denied their request for class action status earlier this year.

Cherwek will receive a tax rebate check for $1,300 for 2012, but was dissatisfied that he and others will not see relief for the 2010 and 2011 tax years. “We finally got a victory here, where about 110 people now will get rebates…we won the war, but I feel we were cheated out of rebates for 2010 and 2011,” he said.

Cherwek said he was disappointed when the Supreme Court denied their request for class action status. He wrote in a recent letter to the editor. “The parties involved were elated when they learned that finally the substance of our class action suit on such a serious statewide issue would potentially be reviewed by the New Hampshire Supreme Court.”

The appeal to the Supreme Court was answered with one word ‘denied.’  No reason was given, no indication as to why. In fact, no evidence that our well argued appeal was even read because they can legally do this even though we met all of their criteria. About  $13,000 has been spent to date and the facts of the issue have not even been looked at. Is this justice? No, this is justice denied!”

Homeowner Jim Fitzpatrick, another main party in the attempted class action suit, said his rebate was about $1,000 and that his total land and home value decreased from $711,000 to $659,000. “Given the whole situation, I think it was a fair settlement,” he said.

Fitzpatrick credited Haywood’s diligence and fairness.

“Now, on the positive side, I think the town made a good decision to get a new assessor. This guy works with you. I think going forward he will bring some semblance of fairness to the assessment process,” he said.

The properties in question were located on the following roads: Danville Road, Channel Road, Nichols Road, Bay Point Road, Leavitt Road, Cove Road, Broad Bay Road, Lower Broad Bay Road, Jay Loop, Remle Road, Old Broad Bay Road, Ridge Road, Spur Road, Deer Cove Road, Patch Pond Road, South Shore Road, Spaulding Road, Furber Road, Pequawket Trail, Cassie Cove Road, Long Sands Road, Bluffs Boulevard, Weetamoe Road, Briggs Road, Cold Springs Circle, Frost Road, Ossipee Lake Drive, Hodsdon Shore Road, and Gretchen Road.


  1. atony 11 years ago September 11, 2013

    So maybe now, for the time being, the cost to “run the town” can be
    fairly shared by all residents instead of bilking the lakefront property

    It was good to see so many folks stand up for themselves and pursue fairness.
    However it was most disappointing to see how the judicial system behaved.
    For the Superior and Supreme Courts not to allow the class action (such as many other states have allowed) speaks volumes about the NH government.
    Most certainly, in my opinion, the courts did not want to set any kind of precedent that would spark other unfairly taxed lakefront property owners (on Ossipee lake or any other lakes state wide for that matter) into pursuing tax relief. The Courts must know all too well not to mess with the revenue stream regardless of how unscrupulous the local towns are at assessment.
    As for the Ossipee BOS they have had presentations made to them and had all the data and facts regarding the disproportionate assessments but they chose to support the inflated assessments of the very assessor they ultimately “fired” .

    Well the old assessor is gone and the new assessor seems to have an objective and fair approach to valuing the lake front properties. Imagine that… our property values on the lake are now a much closer match to the real estate market. A genuine and appreciative thanks to
    the new assessor.

    As far as the town BOS and the budgets are concerned, well, my advice is to control your spending. Providing water utilities to a small portion of
    the town at the expense of all the other tax payers and oversized fire trucks
    that are not needed in the town are the types of expenses that you cannot

    • Steve Foley 11 years ago September 27, 2013

      Kudos, to all who stood up for themselves.

  2. Native Son 11 years ago September 29, 2013

    Gotta love it. All the massholes (atony being atypical) move to Ossipee, demand the same level of services they had from the Commonwealth, and then bitch when the bill comes. Oh, and blame it on the courts, the selectmen, the moon, the sun & global warming. Unbelievable!

    • Atony 11 years ago October 2, 2013

      said anything about demanding services??? If I were to compare services
      between HN and another state I certainly would not choose the
      Commonwealth as some sort of pinnacle
      of Gov success.

      You missed the point
      entirely. The complaint is about fairness and that the lake front
      property owners are being over assessed compared to everyone else in town.
      The town of Ossipee benefited significantly from those erroneous assessments
      and the Courts did not want to be bothered hearing the case.

      Maybe your just upset that
      you now may have to “pay your fair share” rather than be carried by
      those very “Massholes” that help subsidize so many of the services
      that you enjoy but they themselves will never realize.

      So sorry you now may have
      to pay attention to what you selectman are spending tax dollars on….because,
      well, now you will be giving them more of YOUR money.

      Lots of luck Naive Son!!!

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *